What are the chances of seeing a Great Black-Hawk in Iguazú National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Great Black-Hawk sighting in Iguazú National Park on a given day, based on 56 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 253rd most-seen of the 343 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Great Black-Hawk in Iguazú National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Great Black-Hawk in Iguazú National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Great Black-Hawk?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Great Black-Hawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Iguazú National Park the best place to see a Great Black-Hawk?
34th of 46
Of the 46 parks where we can rate Great Black-Hawk sightings, Iguazú National Park ranks 34th at under 5%. The best odds are in Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 70%), Main Ridge Forest Reserve (Trinidad and Tobago, about 40%) and El Impenetrable National Park (Argentina, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Great Black-Hawk live in Iguazú National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Great Black-Hawk that you can see in Iguazú National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Roadside Hawk (about 30%), Plumbeous Kite (about 20%) and Snail Kite (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Great Black-Hawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Great Black-Hawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Iguazú National Park (56 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.