What are the chances of seeing a Dusky Crag Martin in Jim Corbett National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Dusky Crag Martin sighting in Jim Corbett National Park on a given day, based on 23 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 285th most-seen of the 368 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Dusky Crag Martin in Jim Corbett National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Dusky Crag Martin in Jim Corbett National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Dusky Crag Martin?
Between 4 and 7 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Dusky Crag Martin sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Jim Corbett National Park the best place to see a Dusky Crag Martin?
11th of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Dusky Crag Martin sightings, Jim Corbett National Park ranks 11th at under 5%. The best odds are in Gir National Park (India, about 30%), Ranthambore National Park (India, about 20%) and Eravikulam National Park (India, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Dusky Crag Martin live in Jim Corbett National Park?
Same family: Hirundinidae
The closest relatives of the Dusky Crag Martin that you can see in Jim Corbett National Park (family Hirundinidae, Swallows and Martins) are Eastern Red-rumped Swallow (about 20%), Gray-throated Martin (about 20%) and Barn Swallow (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Dusky Crag Martin sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dusky Crag Martin is recorded against all the birds logged in Jim Corbett National Park (23 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.