What are the chances of seeing a Slaty-blue Flycatcher in Jim Corbett National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Slaty-blue Flycatcher sighting in Jim Corbett National Park on a given day, based on 325 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 112th most-seen of the 368 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Slaty-blue Flycatcher in Jim Corbett National Park?
January
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Slaty-blue Flycatcher in Jim Corbett National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to October, the lowest months. That is one of Jim Corbett National Park's driest months, with about 45 mm of rain against 360 mm in July.
What time of day is best to see a Slaty-blue Flycatcher?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Slaty-blue Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Jim Corbett National Park the best place to see a Slaty-blue Flycatcher?
Yes
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Slaty-blue Flycatcher sightings, Jim Corbett National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Langtang National Park (Nepal, under 5%) and Namdapha National Park (India, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Slaty-blue Flycatcher live in Jim Corbett National Park?
Same genus: Ficedula
The closest relatives of the Slaty-blue Flycatcher that you can see in Jim Corbett National Park (genus Ficedula, Ficedula Flycatchers) are Taiga Flycatcher (about 10%) and Rufous-gorgeted Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Slaty-blue Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Slaty-blue Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Jim Corbett National Park (325 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.