What are the chances of seeing a Grey Tit-Flycatcher in Kafue National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Grey Tit-Flycatcher sighting in Kafue National Park on a given day, based on 71 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 145th most-seen of the 338 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Grey Tit-Flycatcher in Kafue National Park?
November
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Grey Tit-Flycatcher in Kafue National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–July and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Grey Tit-Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Grey Tit-Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kafue National Park the best place to see a Grey Tit-Flycatcher?
5th of 21
Of the 21 parks where we can rate Grey Tit-Flycatcher sightings, Kafue National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in uMkhuze Game Reserve (South Africa, about 20%), Kibale National Park (Uganda, about 20%) and Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Grey Tit-Flycatcher live in Kafue National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Grey Tit-Flycatcher that you can see in Kafue National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are White-browed Robin-Chat (about 40%), Ashy Alseonax (about 20%) and White-browed Scrub Robin (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Grey Tit-Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Grey Tit-Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Kafue National Park (71 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.