What are the chances of seeing a Bush Stone-curlew in Kakadu National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Bush Stone-curlew sighting in Kakadu National Park on a given day, based on 225 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 87th most-seen of the 186 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bush Stone-curlew in Kakadu National Park?
June and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Bush Stone-curlew in Kakadu National Park on a given day, against about 10% in March–May, July and September–January, the lowest months. Those are among Kakadu National Park's driest months, with almost no rain against 350 mm in January. February has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Bush Stone-curlew?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bush Stone-curlew sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kakadu National Park the best place to see a Bush Stone-curlew?
Among the best
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Bush Stone-curlew sightings, Kakadu National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Daintree National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Bush Stone-curlew live in Kakadu National Park?
Same order: Charadriiformes
The closest relatives of the Bush Stone-curlew that you can see in Kakadu National Park (order Charadriiformes, Shorebirds and Allies) are Comb-crested Jacana (about 50%), Masked Lapwing (about 50%) and Whiskered Tern (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bush Stone-curlew sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bush Stone-curlew is recorded against all the birds logged in Kakadu National Park (225 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.