What are the chances of seeing a White-gaped Honeyeater in Kakadu National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a White-gaped Honeyeater sighting in Kakadu National Park on a given day, based on 924 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 24th most-seen of the 186 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White-gaped Honeyeater in Kakadu National Park?
January
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a White-gaped Honeyeater in Kakadu National Park on a given day, against about 30% in May, the lowest month. That is one of Kakadu National Park's wettest months, with about 350 mm of rain against almost none in August. February has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a White-gaped Honeyeater?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White-gaped Honeyeater sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kakadu National Park the best place to see a White-gaped Honeyeater?
2nd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate White-gaped Honeyeater sightings, Kakadu National Park ranks 2nd at about 50%. The best odds are in Nitmiluk National Park (Australia, about 60%).
Which relatives of the White-gaped Honeyeater live in Kakadu National Park?
Same family: Meliphagidae
The closest relatives of the White-gaped Honeyeater that you can see in Kakadu National Park (family Meliphagidae, Honeyeaters) are White-throated Honeyeater (about 50%), Dusky Honeyeater (about 40%) and Rufous-banded Honeyeater (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White-gaped Honeyeater sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White-gaped Honeyeater is recorded against all the birds logged in Kakadu National Park (924 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.