What are the chances of seeing a Green Iora in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Green Iora sighting in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 190th most-seen of the 203 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Green Iora in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Green Iora in Kerinci Seblat National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season. January has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Green Iora?
Between 1 and 4 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Green Iora sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Kerinci Seblat National Park the best place to see a Green Iora?
12th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Green Iora sightings, Kerinci Seblat National Park ranks 12th at under 5%. The best odds are in Sepilok (Malaysia, about 40%), Way Kambas National Park (Indonesia, about 40%) and Khao Luang National Park (Thailand, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Green Iora live in Kerinci Seblat National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Green Iora that you can see in Kerinci Seblat National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Grey-headed Canary-Flycatcher (about 70%), Gray-throated Babbler (about 60%) and Golden Babbler (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Green Iora sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Green Iora is recorded against all the birds logged in Kerinci Seblat National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.