What are the chances of seeing a Violet-eared Waxbill in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Violet-eared Waxbill sighting in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 106th most-seen of the 122 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Violet-eared Waxbill in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Violet-eared Waxbill in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season. May has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Violet-eared Waxbill?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Violet-eared Waxbill sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park the best place to see a Violet-eared Waxbill?
6th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Violet-eared Waxbill sightings, Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Pilanesberg National Park (South Africa, about 40%), Waterberg Plateau Park (Namibia, about 30%) and Etosha National Park (Namibia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Violet-eared Waxbill live in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park?
Same family: Estrildidae
The closest relatives of the Violet-eared Waxbill that you can see in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park (family Estrildidae, Waxbills and Allies) are Red-headed Finch (about 40%) and Black-faced Waxbill (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Violet-eared Waxbill sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Violet-eared Waxbill is recorded against all the birds logged in Kgalagadi Transfrontier Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.