What are the chances of seeing a Plume-toed Swiftlet in Khao Luang National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Plume-toed Swiftlet sighting in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 168th most-seen of the 215 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Plume-toed Swiftlet in Khao Luang National Park?
June and December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Plume-toed Swiftlet in Khao Luang National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–May, July and September–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Plume-toed Swiftlet?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Plume-toed Swiftlet sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Khao Luang National Park the best place to see a Plume-toed Swiftlet?
10th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Plume-toed Swiftlet sightings, Khao Luang National Park ranks 10th at under 5%. The best odds are in Way Kambas National Park (Indonesia, about 50%), Kinabalu Park (Malaysia, about 50%) and Danum Valley Conservation Area (Malaysia, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Plume-toed Swiftlet live in Khao Luang National Park?
Same family: Apodidae
The closest relatives of the Plume-toed Swiftlet that you can see in Khao Luang National Park (family Apodidae, Swifts) are White-nest Swiftlet (about 50%), Silver-rumped Needletail (about 30%) and Asian Palm-Swift (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Plume-toed Swiftlet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Plume-toed Swiftlet is recorded against all the birds logged in Khao Luang National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.