What are the chances of seeing an Eastern Pondhawk in Lago de Yojoa?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Eastern Pondhawk sighting in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 75th most-seen of the 152 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Eastern Pondhawk in Lago de Yojoa?
July to September
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Eastern Pondhawk in Lago de Yojoa on a given day, against under 5% in February–May and October–December, the lowest months. Those are among Lago de Yojoa's wettest months, with about 260 mm of rain a month against 65 mm in April.
What time of day is best to see an Eastern Pondhawk?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eastern Pondhawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Lago de Yojoa the best place to see an Eastern Pondhawk?
8th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Eastern Pondhawk sightings, Lago de Yojoa ranks 8th at about 10%. The best odds are in Everglades National Park (United States, about 40%), Big Cypress National Preserve (United States, about 30%) and Point Pelee National Park (Canada, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Eastern Pondhawk live in Lago de Yojoa?
Same genus: Erythemis
The closest relatives of the Eastern Pondhawk that you can see in Lago de Yojoa (genus Erythemis, Pondhawks) are Pin-Tailed Pondhawk (about 20%), Flame-Tailed Pondhawk (about 20%) and Black Pondhawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Eastern Pondhawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eastern Pondhawk is recorded against all the insects logged in Lago de Yojoa (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.