What are the chances of seeing a Rufous-gorgeted Flycatcher in Manas National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-gorgeted Flycatcher sighting in Manas National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 363rd most-seen of the 377 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous-gorgeted Flycatcher in Manas National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-gorgeted Flycatcher in Manas National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous-gorgeted Flycatcher?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous-gorgeted Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Manas National Park the best place to see a Rufous-gorgeted Flycatcher?
8th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Rufous-gorgeted Flycatcher sightings, Manas National Park ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in Langtang National Park (Nepal, about 30%), Namdapha National Park (India, about 10%) and Jiuzhaigou National Park (China, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Rufous-gorgeted Flycatcher live in Manas National Park?
Same genus: Ficedula
The closest relatives of the Rufous-gorgeted Flycatcher that you can see in Manas National Park (genus Ficedula, Ficedula Flycatchers) are Taiga Flycatcher (about 20%) and Little Pied Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous-gorgeted Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous-gorgeted Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Manas National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.