What are the chances of seeing a Heliconius aliphera in Manu National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Heliconius aliphera sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 296th most-seen of the 366 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Heliconius aliphera in Manu National Park?
May, August–September and November–December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Heliconius aliphera in Manu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–April, June–July and October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Heliconius aliphera?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Heliconius aliphera sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manu National Park the best place to see a Heliconius aliphera?
5th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Heliconius aliphera sightings, Manu National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 20%), Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 20%) and Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Heliconius aliphera live in Manu National Park?
Same genus: Heliconius
The closest relatives of the Heliconius aliphera that you can see in Manu National Park (genus Heliconius, Longwings and Heliconians) are Doris Longwing (about 20%), Red Postman (about 20%) and Sara Longwing (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Heliconius aliphera sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Heliconius aliphera is recorded against all the insects logged in Manu National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.