What are the chances of seeing a Tiger Longwing in Manu National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Tiger Longwing sighting in Manu National Park on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 103rd most-seen of the 366 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Tiger Longwing in Manu National Park?
July and September
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Tiger Longwing in Manu National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–May and August, the lowest months. Those are among Manu National Park's driest months, with about 80 mm of rain a month against 290 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Tiger Longwing?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Tiger Longwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Manu National Park the best place to see a Tiger Longwing?
17th of 19
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Tiger Longwing sightings, Manu National Park ranks 17th at about 10%. The best odds are in Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 20%), Santa Rosa National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%) and Lago de Yojoa (Honduras, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Tiger Longwing live in Manu National Park?
Same genus: Heliconius
The closest relatives of the Tiger Longwing that you can see in Manu National Park (genus Heliconius, Longwings and Heliconians) are Doris Longwing (about 20%), Red Postman (about 20%) and Sara Longwing (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Tiger Longwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Tiger Longwing is recorded against all the insects logged in Manu National Park (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.