What are the chances of seeing a Croaking Cisticola in Mikumi National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Croaking Cisticola sighting in Mikumi National Park on a given day, based on 32 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 106th most-seen of the 261 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Croaking Cisticola in Mikumi National Park?
February–March, September and December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Croaking Cisticola in Mikumi National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January and July, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Croaking Cisticola?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Croaking Cisticola sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Mikumi National Park the best place to see a Croaking Cisticola?
8th of 21
Of the 21 parks where we can rate Croaking Cisticola sightings, Mikumi National Park ranks 8th at about 10%. The best odds are in Kidepo Valley National Park (Uganda, about 50%), Queen Elizabeth National Park (Uganda, about 20%) and Murchison Falls National Park (Uganda, about 20%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Croaking Cisticola live in Mikumi National Park?
Same genus: Cisticola
The closest relatives of the Croaking Cisticola that you can see in Mikumi National Park (genus Cisticola, Cisticolas) are Rattling Cisticola (about 30%), Piping Cisticola (about 10%) and Desert Cisticola (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Croaking Cisticola sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Croaking Cisticola is recorded against all the birds logged in Mikumi National Park (32 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.