What are the chances of seeing a Black-faced Woodswallow in Nitmiluk National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Woodswallow sighting in Nitmiluk National Park on a given day, based on 22 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 72nd most-seen of the 103 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-faced Woodswallow in Nitmiluk National Park?
January
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Woodswallow in Nitmiluk National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March and July–December, the lowest months. That is one of Nitmiluk National Park's wettest months, with about 270 mm of rain against almost none in August.
What time of day is best to see a Black-faced Woodswallow?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-faced Woodswallow sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Nitmiluk National Park the best place to see a Black-faced Woodswallow?
3rd of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Black-faced Woodswallow sightings, Nitmiluk National Park ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Uluru-Kata Tjuta National Park (Australia, about 40%) and Cape Range (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Black-faced Woodswallow live in Nitmiluk National Park?
Same genus: Artamus
The closest relatives of the Black-faced Woodswallow that you can see in Nitmiluk National Park (genus Artamus, Woodswallows) are Little Woodswallow (about 10%) and White-breasted Woodswallow (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-faced Woodswallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-faced Woodswallow is recorded against all the birds logged in Nitmiluk National Park (22 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.