What are the chances of seeing a Common tent-making Bat in Piedras Blancas National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Common tent-making Bat sighting in Piedras Blancas National Park on a given day, based on 21 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 8th most-seen of the 21 mammals we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Common tent-making Bat in Piedras Blancas National Park?
May
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Common tent-making Bat in Piedras Blancas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June, August–October and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Common tent-making Bat?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Common tent-making Bat sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Piedras Blancas National Park the best place to see a Common tent-making Bat?
Among the best
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Common tent-making Bat sightings, Piedras Blancas National Park ranks 2nd at about 30%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Manuel Antonio National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Common tent-making Bat live in Piedras Blancas National Park?
Same order: Chiroptera
The closest relatives of the Common tent-making Bat that you can see in Piedras Blancas National Park (order Chiroptera, Bats) are Greater Sac-winged Bat (about 10%) and Proboscis Bat (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Common tent-making Bat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Common tent-making Bat is recorded against all the mammals logged in Piedras Blancas National Park (21 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.