What are the chances of seeing a Greater Striped-Swallow in Pilanesberg National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Greater Striped-Swallow sighting in Pilanesberg National Park on a given day, based on 52 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 103rd most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Greater Striped-Swallow in Pilanesberg National Park?
October
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Greater Striped-Swallow in Pilanesberg National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June to August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Greater Striped-Swallow?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Greater Striped-Swallow sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Pilanesberg National Park the best place to see a Greater Striped-Swallow?
5th of 16
Of the 16 parks where we can rate Greater Striped-Swallow sightings, Pilanesberg National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in De Hoop Nature Reserve (South Africa, about 50%), Golden Gate Highlands National Park (South Africa, about 30%) and Garden Route National Park (South Africa, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Greater Striped-Swallow live in Pilanesberg National Park?
Same genus: Cecropis
The closest relatives of the Greater Striped-Swallow that you can see in Pilanesberg National Park (genus Cecropis, Red-rumped Swallows, Striped Swallows, and Allies) are Lesser Striped-Swallow (about 30%) and Rufous-chested Swallow (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Greater Striped-Swallow sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Greater Striped-Swallow is recorded against all the birds logged in Pilanesberg National Park (52 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.