What are the chances of seeing a House Martin in Pilanesberg National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a House Martin sighting in Pilanesberg National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 202nd most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a House Martin in Pilanesberg National Park?
February, September and November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a House Martin in Pilanesberg National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–August, October and December–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a House Martin?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most House Martin sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Pilanesberg National Park the best place to see a House Martin?
38th of 58
Of the 58 parks where we can rate House Martin sightings, Pilanesberg National Park ranks 38th at under 5%. The best odds are in Monfragüe National Park (Spain, about 50%), Tatra National Park (Slovakia, about 50%) and Hohe Tauern National Park (Austria, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the House Martin live in Pilanesberg National Park?
Same family: Hirundinidae
The closest relatives of the House Martin that you can see in Pilanesberg National Park (family Hirundinidae, Swallows and Martins) are Lesser Striped-Swallow (about 30%), Pearl-breasted Swallow (about 20%) and White-throated Swallow (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the House Martin sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the House Martin is recorded against all the birds logged in Pilanesberg National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.