What are the chances of seeing a Latticed Heath in Plitvice Lakes National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Latticed Heath sighting in Plitvice Lakes National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 43rd most-seen of the 51 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 50%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Latticed Heath in Plitvice Lakes National Park?
June
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Latticed Heath in Plitvice Lakes National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–May and July–October, the lowest months. December has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Latticed Heath?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Latticed Heath sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Plitvice Lakes National Park the best place to see a Latticed Heath?
6th of 18
Of the 18 parks where we can rate Latticed Heath sightings, Plitvice Lakes National Park ranks 6th at about 20%. The best odds are in Biebrza National Park (Poland, about 30%), Białowieża National Park (Poland, about 20%) and Aigüestortes National Park (Spain, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Latticed Heath live in Plitvice Lakes National Park?
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Latticed Heath that you can see in Plitvice Lakes National Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Silver-Washed Fritillary (about 50%), Nine-Spotted Moth (about 40%) and Far Eastern Large Skipper (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Latticed Heath sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Latticed Heath is recorded against all the insects logged in Plitvice Lakes National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.