What are the chances of seeing a Middle Spotted Woodpecker in Plitvice Lakes National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Middle Spotted Woodpecker sighting in Plitvice Lakes National Park on a given day, based on 45 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 37th most-seen of the 76 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Middle Spotted Woodpecker in Plitvice Lakes National Park?
October
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Middle Spotted Woodpecker in Plitvice Lakes National Park on a given day, against about 10% in May to July, the lowest months. December to February have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Middle Spotted Woodpecker?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Middle Spotted Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Plitvice Lakes National Park the best place to see a Middle Spotted Woodpecker?
2nd of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Middle Spotted Woodpecker sightings, Plitvice Lakes National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%. The best odds are in Białowieża National Park (Poland, about 40%).
Which relatives of the Middle Spotted Woodpecker live in Plitvice Lakes National Park?
Same family: Picidae
The closest relatives of the Middle Spotted Woodpecker that you can see in Plitvice Lakes National Park (family Picidae, Woodpeckers) are Great Spotted Woodpecker (about 30%), Grey-headed Woodpecker (about 20%) and White-backed Woodpecker (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Middle Spotted Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Middle Spotted Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Plitvice Lakes National Park (45 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.