What are the chances of seeing a Discrete Chaperon in Pyrénées National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Discrete Chaperon sighting in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 1026th most-seen of the 1277 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Discrete Chaperon in Pyrénées National Park?
March and September–October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Discrete Chaperon in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–August and November–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Discrete Chaperon?
Between 11 pm and 2 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Discrete Chaperon sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Pyrénées National Park the best place to see a Discrete Chaperon?
5th of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Discrete Chaperon sightings, Pyrénées National Park ranks 5th at under 5%. The best odds are in Sierra Nevada National Park (Spain, about 20%), Doñana National Park (Spain, about 10%) and Cévennes National Park (France, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Discrete Chaperon live in Pyrénées National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Discrete Chaperon that you can see in Pyrénées National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Jersey Tiger (about 20%), Scarlet Tiger (about 20%) and Burnet Companion (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Discrete Chaperon sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Discrete Chaperon is recorded against all the insects logged in Pyrénées National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.