What are the chances of seeing a Scarlet Tiger in Pyrénées National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Scarlet Tiger sighting in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, based on 128 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 46th most-seen of the 1277 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Scarlet Tiger in Pyrénées National Park?
July
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Scarlet Tiger in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September–October and December–March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Scarlet Tiger?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Scarlet Tiger sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Pyrénées National Park the best place to see a Scarlet Tiger?
Among the best
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Scarlet Tiger sightings, Pyrénées National Park ranks 5th at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Aigüestortes National Park (Spain, about 20%), Białowieża National Park (Poland, about 20%) and Triglav National Park (Slovenia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Scarlet Tiger live in Pyrénées National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Scarlet Tiger that you can see in Pyrénées National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Jersey Tiger (about 20%), Burnet Companion (about 10%) and Four-Spotted Footman (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Scarlet Tiger sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Scarlet Tiger is recorded against all the insects logged in Pyrénées National Park (128 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.