What are the chances of seeing a Small Dusty Wave in Pyrénées National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Small Dusty Wave sighting in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, based on 16 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 547th most-seen of the 1277 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Small Dusty Wave in Pyrénées National Park?
March–May and August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Small Dusty Wave in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June–July and September–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Small Dusty Wave?
Between 9 pm and midnight
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Small Dusty Wave sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Pyrénées National Park the best place to see a Small Dusty Wave?
Among the best
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Small Dusty Wave sightings, Pyrénées National Park ranks 4th at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Cévennes National Park (France, about 10%), Bavarian Forest National Park (Germany, about 10%) and Wadden Sea National Park (Germany, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Small Dusty Wave live in Pyrénées National Park?
Same genus: Idaea
The closest relatives of the Small Dusty Wave that you can see in Pyrénées National Park (genus Idaea) are Riband Wave (about 10%), Small Fan-Footed Wave (about 10%) and Portland Ribbon Wave (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Small Dusty Wave sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Small Dusty Wave is recorded against all the insects logged in Pyrénées National Park (16 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.