What are the chances of seeing a Thick-Legged Hover Fly in Pyrénées National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Thick-Legged Hover Fly sighting in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 806th most-seen of the 1277 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Thick-Legged Hover Fly in Pyrénées National Park?
February, May and October–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Thick-Legged Hover Fly in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April, June–September and December–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Thick-Legged Hover Fly?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Thick-Legged Hover Fly sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Pyrénées National Park the best place to see a Thick-Legged Hover Fly?
8th of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Thick-Legged Hover Fly sightings, Pyrénées National Park ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in Acadia National Park (United States, about 10%), Camargue (France, about 10%) and Snowdonia National Park (United Kingdom, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Thick-Legged Hover Fly live in Pyrénées National Park?
Same family: Syrphidae
The closest relatives of the Thick-Legged Hover Fly that you can see in Pyrénées National Park (family Syrphidae, Hover Flies) are Common Drone Fly (about 10%), Tapered Drone Fly (about 10%) and Marmalade Hover Fly (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Thick-Legged Hover Fly sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Thick-Legged Hover Fly is recorded against all the insects logged in Pyrénées National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.