What are the chances of seeing a Red Avadavat in Royal Bardia National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red Avadavat sighting in Royal Bardia National Park on a given day, based on 37 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 116th most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red Avadavat in Royal Bardia National Park?
October
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Red Avadavat in Royal Bardia National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to June, the lowest months. That is one of Royal Bardia National Park's driest months, with about 80 mm of rain against 590 mm in July. August has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Red Avadavat?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red Avadavat sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Royal Bardia National Park the best place to see a Red Avadavat?
Yes
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Red Avadavat sightings, Royal Bardia National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Keoladeo National Park (India, about 10%) and Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Red Avadavat live in Royal Bardia National Park?
Same family: Estrildidae
The closest relatives of the Red Avadavat that you can see in Royal Bardia National Park (family Estrildidae, Waxbills and Allies) are Nutmeg Mannikin (about 30%) and Tricolored Munia (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red Avadavat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red Avadavat is recorded against all the birds logged in Royal Bardia National Park (37 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.