What are the chances of seeing a Red-naped Ibis in Royal Bardia National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Red-naped Ibis sighting in Royal Bardia National Park on a given day, based on 97 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 52nd most-seen of the 233 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-naped Ibis in Royal Bardia National Park?
June and October
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Red-naped Ibis in Royal Bardia National Park on a given day, against about 10% in February and September, the lowest months. August has too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Red-naped Ibis?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-naped Ibis sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Royal Bardia National Park the best place to see a Red-naped Ibis?
4th of 12
Of the 12 parks where we can rate Red-naped Ibis sightings, Royal Bardia National Park ranks 4th at about 30%. The best odds are in Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 60%), Bandhavgarh National Park (India, about 30%) and Gir National Park (India, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Red-naped Ibis live in Royal Bardia National Park?
Same order: Pelecaniformes
The closest relatives of the Red-naped Ibis that you can see in Royal Bardia National Park (order Pelecaniformes, Pelicans, Herons, Ibises, and Allies) are Indian Pond Heron (about 40%), Little Egret (about 30%) and Grey Heron (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-naped Ibis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-naped Ibis is recorded against all the birds logged in Royal Bardia National Park (97 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.