What are the chances of seeing a Green Hairstreak in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Green Hairstreak sighting in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park on a given day, based on 46 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 103rd most-seen of the 597 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Green Hairstreak in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
April
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Green Hairstreak in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Green Hairstreak?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Green Hairstreak sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Sierra de Guadarrama National Park the best place to see a Green Hairstreak?
15th of 16
Of the 16 parks where we can rate Green Hairstreak sightings, Sierra de Guadarrama National Park ranks 15th at about 10%. The best odds are in Vanoise National Park (France, about 20%), Hohe Tauern National Park (Austria, about 20%) and Gauja National Park (Latvia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Green Hairstreak live in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
Same family: Lycaenidae
The closest relatives of the Green Hairstreak that you can see in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (family Lycaenidae, Gossamer-winged Butterflies) are Small Copper (about 30%), Southern Brown Argus (about 20%) and Iberian Sooty Copper (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Green Hairstreak sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Green Hairstreak is recorded against all the insects logged in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (46 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.