What are the chances of seeing a Scarlet Tiger in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Scarlet Tiger sighting in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 528th most-seen of the 597 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Scarlet Tiger in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
March and July
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Scarlet Tiger in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April–June and August–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Scarlet Tiger?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Scarlet Tiger sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Sierra de Guadarrama National Park the best place to see a Scarlet Tiger?
13th of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Scarlet Tiger sightings, Sierra de Guadarrama National Park ranks 13th at under 5%. The best odds are in Aigüestortes National Park (Spain, about 20%), Białowieża National Park (Poland, about 20%) and Triglav National Park (Slovenia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Scarlet Tiger live in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Scarlet Tiger that you can see in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Cinnabar Moth (about 20%), Jersey Tiger (about 10%) and Oak Yellow Underwing (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Scarlet Tiger sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Scarlet Tiger is recorded against all the insects logged in Sierra de Guadarrama National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.