What are the chances of seeing a Dusky-faced Tanager in Soberanía National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Dusky-faced Tanager sighting in Soberanía National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 428th most-seen of the 449 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Dusky-faced Tanager in Soberanía National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Dusky-faced Tanager in Soberanía National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Dusky-faced Tanager?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Dusky-faced Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Soberanía National Park the best place to see a Dusky-faced Tanager?
11th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Dusky-faced Tanager sightings, Soberanía National Park ranks 11th at under 5%. The best odds are in Utría National Natural Park (Colombia, about 10%), Darién National Park (Panama, about 10%) and Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (Colombia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Dusky-faced Tanager live in Soberanía National Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Dusky-faced Tanager that you can see in Soberanía National Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Tropical Kingbird (about 60%), Palm Tanager (about 60%) and Cocoa Woodcreeper (about 60%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Dusky-faced Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dusky-faced Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Soberanía National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.