What are the chances of seeing a Fallen Bark Looper in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Fallen Bark Looper sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 129th most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Fallen Bark Looper in Springbrook National Park?
June–July and November
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Fallen Bark Looper in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–May, October and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Fallen Bark Looper?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Fallen Bark Looper sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see a Fallen Bark Looper?
5th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Fallen Bark Looper sightings, Springbrook National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Kosciuszko National Park (Australia, about 20%), Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Fallen Bark Looper live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Fallen Bark Looper that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Paradromulia ambigua (about 20%), White Looper Moth (about 20%) and Southern Bracca (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Fallen Bark Looper sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Fallen Bark Looper is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.