What are the chances of seeing a Winding Cisticola in Tarangire National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Winding Cisticola sighting in Tarangire National Park on a given day, based on 252 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 121st most-seen of the 411 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Winding Cisticola in Tarangire National Park?
March and April
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Winding Cisticola in Tarangire National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August, the lowest month. Those are among Tarangire National Park's wettest months, with about 140 mm of rain a month against almost none in September.
What time of day is best to see a Winding Cisticola?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Winding Cisticola sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tarangire National Park the best place to see a Winding Cisticola?
9th of 24
Of the 24 parks where we can rate Winding Cisticola sightings, Tarangire National Park ranks 9th at about 20%. The best odds are in Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 50%), Semuliki National Park (Uganda, about 30%) and Amboseli National Park (Kenya, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Winding Cisticola live in Tarangire National Park?
Same genus: Cisticola
The closest relatives of the Winding Cisticola that you can see in Tarangire National Park (genus Cisticola, Cisticolas) are Rattling Cisticola (about 40%), Zitting Cisticola (about 10%) and Desert Cisticola (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Winding Cisticola sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Winding Cisticola is recorded against all the birds logged in Tarangire National Park (252 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.