What are the chances of seeing a Rufous-margined Antwren in Tijuca National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-margined Antwren sighting in Tijuca National Park on a given day, based on 423 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 39th most-seen of the 214 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous-margined Antwren in Tijuca National Park?
April
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-margined Antwren in Tijuca National Park on a given day, against about 10% in March, August, October and December–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous-margined Antwren?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous-margined Antwren sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Tijuca National Park the best place to see a Rufous-margined Antwren?
4th of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Rufous-margined Antwren sightings, Tijuca National Park ranks 4th at about 20%. The best odds are in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 50%), Iguazú National Park (Argentina, about 40%) and Iguaçu National Park (Brazil, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Rufous-margined Antwren live in Tijuca National Park?
Same family: Thamnophilidae
The closest relatives of the Rufous-margined Antwren that you can see in Tijuca National Park (family Thamnophilidae, Typical Antbirds) are Chestnut-backed Antshrike (about 20%), Plain Antvireo (about 10%) and Scaled Antbird (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous-margined Antwren sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous-margined Antwren is recorded against all the birds logged in Tijuca National Park (423 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.