What are the chances of seeing a Dusky-faced Tanager in Utría National Natural Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Dusky-faced Tanager sighting in Utría National Natural Park on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 92nd most-seen of the 154 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Dusky-faced Tanager in Utría National Natural Park?
February and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Dusky-faced Tanager in Utría National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in October, the lowest month. April, June and December have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Dusky-faced Tanager?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Dusky-faced Tanager sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Utría National Natural Park the best place to see a Dusky-faced Tanager?
Yes
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Dusky-faced Tanager sightings, Utría National Natural Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Darién National Park (Panama, about 10%) and Farallones de Cali National Natural Park (Colombia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Dusky-faced Tanager live in Utría National Natural Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Dusky-faced Tanager that you can see in Utría National Natural Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Great-tailed Grackle (about 60%), Chestnut-backed Antbird (about 50%) and Flame-rumped Tanager (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Dusky-faced Tanager sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Dusky-faced Tanager is recorded against all the birds logged in Utría National Natural Park (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.