What are the chances of seeing an Eastern Marsh-Harrier in Way Kambas National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Eastern Marsh-Harrier sighting in Way Kambas National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 202nd most-seen of the 205 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Eastern Marsh-Harrier in Way Kambas National Park?
October
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Eastern Marsh-Harrier in Way Kambas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March to September, the lowest months. November to February have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see an Eastern Marsh-Harrier?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eastern Marsh-Harrier sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Way Kambas National Park the best place to see an Eastern Marsh-Harrier?
Among the best
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Eastern Marsh-Harrier sightings, Way Kambas National Park ranks 2nd at under 5%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Manas National Park (India, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Eastern Marsh-Harrier live in Way Kambas National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Eastern Marsh-Harrier that you can see in Way Kambas National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Gray-headed Fish-Eagle (about 20%), Black-winged Kite (about 20%) and Oriental Honey-buzzard (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Eastern Marsh-Harrier sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eastern Marsh-Harrier is recorded against all the birds logged in Way Kambas National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.