What are the chances of seeing a Collared Kingfisher in Way Kambas National Park?
Very likely
About 70% of wildlife watchers report a Collared Kingfisher sighting in Way Kambas National Park on a given day, based on 218 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 2nd most-seen of the 205 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Collared Kingfisher in Way Kambas National Park?
October
In that month about 90% of wildlife watchers report a Collared Kingfisher in Way Kambas National Park on a given day, against about 40% in June, the lowest month. November to February have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Collared Kingfisher?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Collared Kingfisher sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Way Kambas National Park the best place to see a Collared Kingfisher?
4th of 15
Of the 15 parks where we can rate Collared Kingfisher sightings, Way Kambas National Park ranks 4th at about 70%. The best odds are in Bali Barat National Park (Indonesia, about 80%), Sundarbans National Park (India, about 80%) and Komodo National Park (Indonesia, about 70%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Collared Kingfisher live in Way Kambas National Park?
Same family: Alcedinidae
The closest relatives of the Collared Kingfisher that you can see in Way Kambas National Park (family Alcedinidae, Kingfishers) are White-throated Kingfisher (about 60%), Rufous-collared Kingfisher (about 40%) and Banded Kingfisher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Collared Kingfisher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Collared Kingfisher is recorded against all the birds logged in Way Kambas National Park (218 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.