What are the chances of seeing a Violaceous Jay in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Violaceous Jay sighting in Amacayacu National Natural Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 376th most-seen of the 436 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Violaceous Jay in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
May and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Violaceous Jay in Amacayacu National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in June–September and November–April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Violaceous Jay?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Violaceous Jay sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amacayacu National Natural Park the best place to see a Violaceous Jay?
8th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Violaceous Jay sightings, Amacayacu National Natural Park ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in Sierra de la Macarena National Park (Colombia, about 70%), Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 50%) and Manu National Park (Peru, about 40%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Violaceous Jay live in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
Same order: Passeriformes
The closest relatives of the Violaceous Jay that you can see in Amacayacu National Natural Park (order Passeriformes, Perching Birds) are Russet-backed Oropendola (about 70%), Yellow-rumped Cacique (about 60%) and Silver-beaked Tanager (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Violaceous Jay sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Violaceous Jay is recorded against all the birds logged in Amacayacu National Natural Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.