What are the chances of seeing a Golden-headed Manakin in Anavilhanas National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-headed Manakin sighting in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 240th most-seen of the 291 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Golden-headed Manakin in Anavilhanas National Park?
July and December–January
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Golden-headed Manakin in Anavilhanas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–June and August–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Golden-headed Manakin?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Golden-headed Manakin sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Anavilhanas National Park the best place to see a Golden-headed Manakin?
9th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Golden-headed Manakin sightings, Anavilhanas National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Darién National Park (Panama, about 40%), Brownsberg Nature Park (Suriname, about 40%) and Sierra de la Macarena National Park (Colombia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Golden-headed Manakin live in Anavilhanas National Park?
Same genus: Pipra
The closest relatives of the Golden-headed Manakin that you can see in Anavilhanas National Park (genus Pipra, Orange-headed and Wire-tailed Manakins) are Wire-tailed Manakin (about 30%) and White-crowned Manakin (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Golden-headed Manakin sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Golden-headed Manakin is recorded against all the birds logged in Anavilhanas National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.