What are the chances of seeing a Black-faced Grosbeak in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Grosbeak sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 252 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 305th most-seen of the 503 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-faced Grosbeak in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-faced Grosbeak in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Black-faced Grosbeak?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-faced Grosbeak sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Arenal Volcano National Park the best place to see a Black-faced Grosbeak?
9th of 13
Of the 13 parks where we can rate Black-faced Grosbeak sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Cockscomb Basin Wildlife Sanctuary (Belize, about 30%), Braulio Carrillo National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%) and Tenorio Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Black-faced Grosbeak live in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Same family: Cardinalidae
The closest relatives of the Black-faced Grosbeak that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (family Cardinalidae, Cardinals and Allies) are Summer Tanager (about 40%), Red Tanager (about 30%) and Carmiol's Tanager (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-faced Grosbeak sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-faced Grosbeak is recorded against all the birds logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (252 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.