What are the chances of seeing a Tufted Flycatcher in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Tufted Flycatcher sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 759 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 206th most-seen of the 503 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Tufted Flycatcher in Arenal Volcano National Park?
May–July, September–October and December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Tufted Flycatcher in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–April, August and November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Tufted Flycatcher?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Tufted Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Arenal Volcano National Park the best place to see a Tufted Flycatcher?
10th of 15
Of the 15 parks where we can rate Tufted Flycatcher sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 10th at under 5%. The best odds are in Volcán Barú National Park (Panama, about 40%), Los Quetzales National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%) and El Triunfo (Mexico, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Tufted Flycatcher live in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Tufted Flycatcher that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 70%), Social Flycatcher (about 50%) and Tropical Kingbird (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Tufted Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Tufted Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (759 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.