What are the chances of seeing a Red Avadavat in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Red Avadavat sighting in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, based on 41 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 158th most-seen of the 241 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red Avadavat in Bandhavgarh National Park?
January and October–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red Avadavat in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–September and December, the lowest months. Those are among Bandhavgarh National Park's driest months, with about 20 mm of rain a month against 400 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see a Red Avadavat?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red Avadavat sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bandhavgarh National Park the best place to see a Red Avadavat?
6th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Red Avadavat sightings, Bandhavgarh National Park ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Royal Bardia National Park (Nepal, about 10%), Keoladeo National Park (India, about 10%) and Chitwan National Park (Nepal, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Red Avadavat live in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Same family: Estrildidae
The closest relatives of the Red Avadavat that you can see in Bandhavgarh National Park (family Estrildidae, Waxbills and Allies) are White-rumped Munia (about 20%), Nutmeg Mannikin (about 10%) and Indian Silverbill (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red Avadavat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red Avadavat is recorded against all the birds logged in Bandhavgarh National Park (41 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.