What are the chances of seeing a Rufous Treepie in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Likely
About 60% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Treepie sighting in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, based on 1,398 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 12th most-seen of the 241 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous Treepie in Bandhavgarh National Park?
January, May–June and October
In those months about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous Treepie in Bandhavgarh National Park on a given day, against about 30% in July, the lowest month. Those are among Bandhavgarh National Park's driest months, with about 55 mm of rain a month against 400 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous Treepie?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous Treepie sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bandhavgarh National Park the best place to see a Rufous Treepie?
5th of 22
Of the 22 parks where we can rate Rufous Treepie sightings, Bandhavgarh National Park ranks 5th at about 60%. The best odds are in Ranthambore National Park (India, about 80%), Kanha National Park (India, about 70%) and Satpura National Park (India, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Rufous Treepie live in Bandhavgarh National Park?
Same family: Corvidae
The closest relatives of the Rufous Treepie that you can see in Bandhavgarh National Park (family Corvidae, Crows, Jays, and Magpies) are Large-billed Crow (about 70%) and House Crow (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous Treepie sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous Treepie is recorded against all the birds logged in Bandhavgarh National Park (1,398 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.