What are the chances of seeing a Red-breasted Flycatcher in Białowieża National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Red-breasted Flycatcher sighting in Białowieża National Park on a given day, based on 248 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 57th most-seen of the 182 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 80%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-breasted Flycatcher in Białowieża National Park?
May and June
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Red-breasted Flycatcher in Białowieża National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March and September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Red-breasted Flycatcher?
Between 4 and 7 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-breasted Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Białowieża National Park the best place to see a Red-breasted Flycatcher?
3rd of 15
Of the 15 parks where we can rate Red-breasted Flycatcher sightings, Białowieża National Park ranks 3rd at about 20%. The best odds are in Keoladeo National Park (India, about 30%) and Bandhavgarh National Park (India, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Red-breasted Flycatcher live in Białowieża National Park?
Same genus: Ficedula
The closest relatives of the Red-breasted Flycatcher that you can see in Białowieża National Park (genus Ficedula, Ficedula Flycatchers) are Collared Flycatcher (about 40%) and European Pied Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-breasted Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-breasted Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Białowieża National Park (248 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.