What are the chances of seeing a Heliotrope Moth in Blue Mountains National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Heliotrope Moth sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 30 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 122nd most-seen of the 789 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Heliotrope Moth in Blue Mountains National Park?
September to April
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Heliotrope Moth in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Heliotrope Moth?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Heliotrope Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Blue Mountains National Park the best place to see a Heliotrope Moth?
6th of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Heliotrope Moth sightings, Blue Mountains National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Flinders Ranges National Park (Australia, about 30%), Hattah-Kulkyne National Park (Australia, about 30%) and Great Otway National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Heliotrope Moth live in Blue Mountains National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Heliotrope Moth that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Light Ermine Moth (about 10%), Bird Dropping Lichen Moth (about 10%) and Tigrioides alterna (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Heliotrope Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Heliotrope Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Blue Mountains National Park (30 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.