What are the chances of seeing a Singing Cisticola in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Singing Cisticola sighting in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 366th most-seen of the 400 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Singing Cisticola in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Singing Cisticola in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Singing Cisticola?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Singing Cisticola sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bwindi Impenetrable National Park the best place to see a Singing Cisticola?
18th of 18
Of the 18 parks where we can rate Singing Cisticola sightings, Bwindi Impenetrable National Park ranks 18th at under 5%. The best odds are in Nairobi National Park (Kenya, about 40%), Arusha National Park (Tanzania, about 30%) and Gorongosa National Park (Mozambique, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Singing Cisticola live in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park?
Same genus: Cisticola
The closest relatives of the Singing Cisticola that you can see in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (genus Cisticola, Cisticolas) are Chubb's Cisticola (about 50%) and Carruthers's Cisticola (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Singing Cisticola sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Singing Cisticola is recorded against all the birds logged in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.