What are the chances of seeing a Mexican Fritillary in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Mexican Fritillary sighting in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 52nd most-seen of the 77 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Mexican Fritillary in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí?
July
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Mexican Fritillary in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí on a given day, against under 5% in June and October–April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Mexican Fritillary?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Mexican Fritillary sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Biotopo Cerro Cahuí the best place to see a Mexican Fritillary?
8th of 14
Of the 14 parks where we can rate Mexican Fritillary sightings, Biotopo Cerro Cahuí ranks 8th at about 10%. The best odds are in Cabo Pulmo National Park (Mexico, about 50%), Jaragua National Park (Dominican Republic, about 30%) and Ostional Wildlife Refuge (Costa Rica, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Mexican Fritillary live in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Mexican Fritillary that you can see in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Banded Peacock (about 40%), White Peacock (about 40%) and Many-Banded Daggerwing (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Mexican Fritillary sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Mexican Fritillary is recorded against all the insects logged in Biotopo Cerro Cahuí (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.