What are the chances of seeing a Black-capped Flycatcher in Chirripó National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-capped Flycatcher sighting in Chirripó National Park on a given day, based on 49 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 213th most-seen of the 332 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-capped Flycatcher in Chirripó National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Black-capped Flycatcher in Chirripó National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Black-capped Flycatcher?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-capped Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chirripó National Park the best place to see a Black-capped Flycatcher?
6th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Black-capped Flycatcher sightings, Chirripó National Park ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Irazú Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 50%), Los Quetzales National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%) and Tapantí-Macizo de la Muerte National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Black-capped Flycatcher live in Chirripó National Park?
Same genus: Empidonax
The closest relatives of the Black-capped Flycatcher that you can see in Chirripó National Park (genus Empidonax, Empidonax Flycatchers) are Yellow-bellied Flycatcher (about 10%) and Yellowish Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-capped Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-capped Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Chirripó National Park (49 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.