What are the chances of seeing a Piratic Flycatcher in Chirripó National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Piratic Flycatcher sighting in Chirripó National Park on a given day, based on 194 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 78th most-seen of the 332 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Piratic Flycatcher in Chirripó National Park?
April
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Piratic Flycatcher in Chirripó National Park on a given day, against under 5% in July to January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Piratic Flycatcher?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Piratic Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chirripó National Park the best place to see a Piratic Flycatcher?
15th of 62
Of the 62 parks where we can rate Piratic Flycatcher sightings, Chirripó National Park ranks 15th at about 10%. The best odds are in Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 30%), Soberanía National Park (Panama, about 20%) and Amacayacu National Natural Park (Colombia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Piratic Flycatcher live in Chirripó National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Piratic Flycatcher that you can see in Chirripó National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 40%), Guatemalan Paltry Tyrannulet (about 40%) and Tropical Kingbird (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Piratic Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Piratic Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Chirripó National Park (194 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.