What are the chances of seeing an Acadian Flycatcher in Chirripó National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Acadian Flycatcher sighting in Chirripó National Park on a given day, based on 15 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 262nd most-seen of the 332 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Acadian Flycatcher in Chirripó National Park?
September
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Acadian Flycatcher in Chirripó National Park on a given day, against under 5% in October to August, the lowest months. That is one of Chirripó National Park's wettest months, with about 550 mm of rain against 75 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see an Acadian Flycatcher?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Acadian Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Chirripó National Park the best place to see an Acadian Flycatcher?
27th of 38
Of the 38 parks where we can rate Acadian Flycatcher sightings, Chirripó National Park ranks 27th at under 5%. The best odds are in Congaree National Park (United States, about 30%), Darién National Park (Panama, about 20%) and Shenandoah National Park (United States, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Acadian Flycatcher live in Chirripó National Park?
Same genus: Empidonax
The closest relatives of the Acadian Flycatcher that you can see in Chirripó National Park (genus Empidonax, Empidonax Flycatchers) are Yellow-bellied Flycatcher (about 10%) and Yellowish Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Acadian Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Acadian Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Chirripó National Park (15 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.