What are the chances of seeing a White-crested Tyrannulet in Belo Horizonte?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a White-crested Tyrannulet sighting in Belo Horizonte on a given day, based on 99 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data. It is the 78th most-seen of the 220 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White-crested Tyrannulet in Belo Horizonte?
March–May, July–August and October
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a White-crested Tyrannulet in Belo Horizonte on a given day, against under 5% in June, September and November–February, the lowest months. Those are among Belo Horizonte's driest months, with about 60 mm of rain a month against 270 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see a White-crested Tyrannulet?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White-crested Tyrannulet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Belo Horizonte the best place to see a White-crested Tyrannulet?
9th of 14
Of the 14 cities where we can rate White-crested Tyrannulet sightings, Belo Horizonte ranks 9th at about 10%. The best odds are in Buenos Aires (Argentina, about 30%), Rosario (Argentina, about 30%) and Cochabamba (Bolivia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the White-crested Tyrannulet live in Belo Horizonte?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the White-crested Tyrannulet that you can see in Belo Horizonte (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 90%), Tropical Kingbird (about 50%) and Boat-billed Flycatcher (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White-crested Tyrannulet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White-crested Tyrannulet is recorded against all the birds logged in Belo Horizonte (99 verified sightings), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.