What are the chances of seeing a Scott's Oriole in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Scott's Oriole sighting in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, based on 30 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 172nd most-seen of the 275 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Scott's Oriole in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
April
In that month about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Scott's Oriole in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May to March, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Scott's Oriole?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Scott's Oriole sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Cumbres de Monterrey National Park the best place to see a Scott's Oriole?
7th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Scott's Oriole sightings, Cumbres de Monterrey National Park ranks 7th at under 5%. The best odds are in Big Bend National Park (United States, about 30%), Cabo Pulmo National Park (Mexico, about 30%) and Guadalupe Mountains National Park (United States, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Scott's Oriole live in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park?
Same genus: Icterus
The closest relatives of the Scott's Oriole that you can see in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (genus Icterus, New World Orioles) are Audubon's Oriole (about 40%) and Hooded Oriole (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Scott's Oriole sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Scott's Oriole is recorded against all the birds logged in Cumbres de Monterrey National Park (30 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.